Gingival augmentation procedures aim to restore or enhance the keratinized tissue around teeth or implants. Two common methods for achieving this goal involve utilizing distinct tissue sources: one harvested from deeper tissue layers and the other sourced more superficially. The choice between these approaches hinges on factors such as the desired aesthetic outcome, the extent of the tissue deficit, and patient-specific considerations. Each technique presents a unique set of advantages and limitations regarding predictability, healing, and patient morbidity.
These augmentation techniques play a significant role in managing gingival recession, improving periodontal health, and creating a more favorable environment for restorative dentistry. The utilization of one approach over the other can influence the long-term stability of the treatment, the amount of root coverage achieved, and the overall aesthetic result. Historically, both methods have demonstrated efficacy in augmenting keratinized tissue, but understanding their distinct characteristics is crucial for informed clinical decision-making.
