Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a proactive framework used in schools to create safe and effective learning environments. This system emphasizes teaching and reinforcing positive behaviors, rather than solely relying on punishment to address misbehavior. For example, a school implementing this framework might establish clear expectations for behavior in common areas like hallways and cafeterias, explicitly teach these expectations to students, and consistently acknowledge students who demonstrate these positive behaviors.
The significance of this approach lies in its data-driven, preventative focus. By analyzing school-wide behavior data, educators can identify areas where behavioral issues are most prevalent and implement targeted interventions. Furthermore, this framework promotes a positive school climate, contributing to improved academic outcomes, reduced disciplinary incidents, and enhanced social-emotional development for all students. The framework emerged from research in applied behavior analysis and organizational behavior management, evolving into a widely adopted approach in educational settings.
This article will delve into the core components of the framework, explore practical implementation strategies, and examine its impact on student outcomes and school climate. Subsequent sections will also address common challenges encountered during implementation and provide guidance on sustaining this system over time, ensuring its continued effectiveness in fostering a positive and supportive learning environment.
1. Prevention
Prevention, in the context of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), is akin to tending to a garden before weeds take root. Rather than solely reacting to disruptive behavior, the framework emphasizes proactively teaching and reinforcing positive expectations. A school proactively implementing this element might, for instance, dedicate the first week of each academic year to explicitly teaching school-wide expectations, such as respect, responsibility, and safety. This proactive approach, if meticulously planned and consistently executed, minimizes the likelihood of behavioral problems arising later in the year. The intent is not merely to suppress undesirable actions, but to cultivate a school environment where positive conduct is the norm.
Consider the case of a middle school grappling with frequent hallway disruptions. Instead of solely relying on disciplinary measures, the PBIS team implemented a proactive strategy: they developed a set of clear, concise hallway expectations (walk calmly, speak respectfully, keep hands and feet to oneself), created visual reminders posted throughout the hallways, and, most importantly, incorporated hallway behavior into their regular teaching. Teachers modeled appropriate hallway conduct and provided positive reinforcement, such as verbal praise and small rewards, to students demonstrating these behaviors. Consequently, the incidence of hallway disruptions decreased noticeably within a few weeks.
The essence of prevention within the framework lies in shifting the focus from reaction to proactive cultivation. It is the understanding that a well-defined and consistently reinforced set of expectations, coupled with a supportive school climate, can significantly reduce the need for reactive disciplinary measures. While challenges undoubtedly exist in consistently implementing preventative strategies, the long-term benefits, including a safer, more positive, and more conducive learning environment, underscore its fundamental importance.
2. Data-driven
The success of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports hinges on a commitment to data-driven decision making. Without rigorous data collection and analysis, the framework risks becoming a collection of well-intentioned but ultimately ineffective practices. The data serves as a compass, guiding schools toward interventions that address specific behavioral challenges and ensuring that resources are allocated effectively. Its the difference between navigating with a map and wandering aimlessly, hoping to stumble upon the right path.
-
Identifying Problem Areas
Data collection illuminates the areas within a school where behavioral issues are most prevalent. This can range from specific locations (e.g., the cafeteria during lunchtime, the hallways between classes) to particular times of day or certain types of incidents (e.g., bullying, defiance, tardiness). A high school, for instance, might discover through office referral data that a disproportionate number of disciplinary incidents occur during the first ten minutes after lunch. This finding would prompt the PBIS team to investigate the underlying causes and implement targeted interventions, such as increased supervision or activities designed to help students transition back to class smoothly.
-
Monitoring Intervention Effectiveness
Data allows schools to track the impact of implemented interventions. By monitoring key metrics, such as office referrals, suspensions, and attendance rates, schools can determine whether an intervention is achieving its intended results. If, after implementing a new program to address bullying, a school sees no significant decrease in reported bullying incidents, the data suggests that the program needs to be adjusted or replaced. This iterative process of data collection, analysis, and adjustment is crucial for ensuring that interventions are truly effective.
-
Resource Allocation
Data provides valuable insights into how to allocate resources effectively. By identifying areas of greatest need, schools can prioritize resources for those areas. For example, if data reveals that a particular grade level is struggling with social-emotional skills, the school might allocate additional funding for social-emotional learning programs in that grade. Data-driven resource allocation ensures that limited resources are used in a way that maximizes impact.
-
Informing Tiered Support
The framework emphasizes providing tiered support based on individual student needs. Data plays a crucial role in identifying students who require additional support. Universal screening data, such as behavior checklists and teacher observations, can help identify students who are at risk for developing behavioral problems. These students can then be provided with targeted interventions at Tier 2 or Tier 3, depending on the severity of their needs. This data-driven approach ensures that students receive the appropriate level of support, preventing problems from escalating and promoting positive outcomes.
The commitment to data-driven decision making is what transforms the framework from a theoretical concept into a practical, effective approach for creating positive school environments. It allows schools to move beyond guesswork and intuition, relying instead on concrete evidence to guide their actions and ensure that their efforts are making a real difference in the lives of their students.
3. Systemic
The concept of “systemic” within Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) denotes a comprehensive, school-wide approach, not a piecemeal collection of initiatives. It’s akin to constructing a building: individual bricks (programs) might be strong, but without a cohesive architectural design (the school-wide system), the structure remains vulnerable and prone to collapse. The framework’s effectiveness hinges on the entire school community embracing and consistently implementing its principles. This means administrators, teachers, support staff, and even bus drivers must be trained and committed to upholding the same behavioral expectations and providing consistent reinforcement. The absence of this unified approach creates inconsistencies that can undermine the program’s impact and confuse students.
Consider a school struggling with bullying. They implement a promising anti-bullying program in the fourth grade, teaching students about empathy and conflict resolution. However, the rest of the school operates under a different set of behavioral expectations and lacks consistent reinforcement strategies. As a result, the positive effects observed in fourth grade are limited and do not generalize to the rest of the school. Bullying persists, albeit perhaps less frequently in that specific grade. This scenario illustrates the failure of a non-systemic approach. A systemic approach, on the other hand, would involve the entire school adopting consistent anti-bullying policies, providing staff training on how to address bullying effectively, and implementing school-wide activities that promote a culture of respect and inclusivity.
In essence, the systemic nature of the framework ensures that its principles are embedded within the fabric of the school culture. It fosters a shared understanding of expectations, consistent application of interventions, and a collective responsibility for creating a positive and supportive learning environment. While implementing the framework requires a significant initial investment of time and resources, the long-term benefits reduced behavioral problems, improved academic outcomes, and a more positive school climate far outweigh the challenges. Without this systemic commitment, the framework remains a collection of isolated efforts, unable to achieve its full potential.
4. Positive Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement is a cornerstone of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). It shifts the focus from punishing undesirable behavior to actively acknowledging and rewarding desired actions. This approach, rooted in behavioral psychology, recognizes that students are more likely to repeat behaviors that result in positive outcomes. The effectiveness of the entire PBIS framework hinges on the consistent and strategic implementation of reinforcement strategies.
-
Acknowledging Effort and Progress
Beyond simply rewarding perfect behavior, this element acknowledges effort and progress towards desired outcomes. Consider a student who consistently struggles with completing assignments on time. Instead of only praising them when they submit a perfect, on-time assignment, the educator recognizes their efforts in breaking down the assignment into smaller tasks, or showing up for extra help. This type of recognition is more likely to motivate the student to continue improving. Such recognition promotes a growth mindset and underscores the value of persistence, crucial elements in both academic achievement and overall well-being.
-
Tangible and Intangible Rewards
Effective implementation requires a balance between tangible and intangible rewards. While small prizes or extra privileges can be motivating for some students, others may respond more favorably to verbal praise, public recognition, or increased responsibility. A classroom teacher, observing that several students are consistently helping their peers with challenging math problems, might publicly commend their helpfulness and award them the role of “Math Mentor” for the week. This elevates their status among their peers and reinforces their helping behavior. Understanding the individual preferences of students is vital for selecting the most impactful reinforcers.
-
Consistency is Key
The power of positive reinforcement is diminished when it is applied inconsistently. Random or infrequent reinforcement can be confusing and less effective than consistent and predictable acknowledgement. Imagine a school where some teachers consistently praise students who follow classroom rules, while others ignore or even reprimand the same behavior. Students are likely to become confused about what is expected of them, and the overall school climate will suffer. A structured approach, with clear expectations and consistent reinforcement across all classrooms and school environments, is essential for creating a positive and predictable environment.
-
Focusing on the Positive: A Culture Shift
The adoption of positive reinforcement strategies often requires a fundamental shift in school culture. Traditional disciplinary approaches tend to focus on punishing negative behavior, which can create a climate of fear and resentment. The goal is to create a school culture where positive behavior is the norm, and where students feel appreciated and supported. A high school principal, committed to fostering a more positive school environment, initiated a school-wide campaign to “catch students being good.” Teachers and staff were encouraged to actively look for students exhibiting positive behaviors, such as helping classmates, showing respect, or making responsible choices, and to reward them with small tokens of appreciation. This initiative gradually transformed the school climate, creating a more positive and supportive learning environment.
These interconnected facets reveal that positive reinforcement is more than just giving rewards. It involves a thoughtful, consistent, and strategic approach to acknowledging and encouraging desired behaviors. Its success is tied to the wider effort to building a positive school climate. Without its thoughtful inclusion the core tenets of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) cannot achieve a sustained influence.
5. Tiered Support
Tiered support, within the framework of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, represents a critical acknowledgment that students possess diverse needs. It moves beyond a one-size-fits-all approach, recognizing that some students require minimal intervention, while others necessitate more intensive and individualized support. This tiered system, much like a well-structured safety net, ensures that all students receive the assistance they need to succeed, both academically and behaviorally. To understand its crucial role, one must delve into the core components of this tiered framework.
-
Tier 1: Universal Support
Tier 1 constitutes the foundation of the support system, providing universal interventions for all students. It encompasses school-wide positive behavior expectations, consistent implementation of classroom management strategies, and proactive teaching of social-emotional skills. Imagine a school where teachers explicitly teach and reinforce expectations such as respect, responsibility, and safety. The aim is to create a positive and predictable learning environment for everyone. Approximately 80-85% of students are expected to respond successfully to this level of support, benefiting from a consistently positive and structured learning experience. If a student continues to struggle despite these interventions, they move to the next tier.
-
Tier 2: Targeted Support
Tier 2 provides targeted interventions for students who require additional support beyond Tier 1. These students may exhibit behaviors that are not effectively addressed by universal strategies. Such interventions include small group counseling, social skills training, or individualized behavior plans. For instance, a student who consistently has difficulty managing their anger might participate in a small group session focused on anger management techniques. Tier 2 interventions are designed to be short-term, focused, and delivered in small groups. Approximately 10-15% of students may require this level of support. If the targeted interventions prove insufficient, the student may need to move to Tier 3.
-
Tier 3: Intensive Support
Tier 3 represents the most intensive level of support, providing individualized interventions for students with significant behavioral or emotional needs. These students may require highly specialized services, such as one-on-one counseling, functional behavior assessments (FBAs), and individualized behavior intervention plans (BIPs). Consider a student with severe anxiety that significantly impacts their ability to attend school. They may benefit from intensive therapy, a structured support system, and a modified academic program. These are highly individualized and require collaboration with families, therapists, and other specialists. Tier 3 support is designed for approximately 1-5% of students and focuses on addressing the root causes of the behavioral challenges.
-
Data-Driven Decision Making Across Tiers
A critical element that weaves through all three tiers is data-driven decision-making. Schools use data to identify students who need additional support, to monitor the effectiveness of interventions, and to adjust strategies as needed. This data might include office referrals, attendance records, academic performance, or behavior checklists. For example, if a school notices a spike in bullying incidents on the playground, they might implement a new Tier 1 intervention, such as increased supervision or peer mediation training. The key to effective tiered support is continuous data collection and analysis, ensuring that students receive the right type and intensity of intervention at the right time.
The success of the framework hinges on the effective implementation of its tiered system. It is this tiered approach that allows schools to address the diverse needs of their student population, providing a comprehensive and supportive learning environment for all. Without a well-defined and consistently implemented tiered system, the promise of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports remains unfulfilled, leaving some students unsupported and at risk of academic or behavioral challenges.
6. Collaboration
Within Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), collaboration emerges not as a mere addendum, but as a foundational pillar. It is the connective tissue that binds educators, families, and community members together, creating a unified front in support of student success. Its presence strengthens the entire framework; its absence weakens the foundation, threatening its overall effectiveness. The framework thrives on shared knowledge, mutual understanding, and collective action.
-
Shared Vision and Goals
Collaboration necessitates the creation of a shared vision for the school’s behavioral expectations and goals. This entails bringing together diverse perspectives from teachers, administrators, support staff, parents, and even students, to define what a positive and supportive school environment looks like. In one elementary school grappling with high suspension rates, the principal initiated a series of collaborative meetings involving all stakeholders. Through open dialogue, they identified the root causes of the behavioral challenges and collectively developed a set of school-wide expectations that reflected the values and beliefs of the entire community. This shared vision became the guiding principle for all behavior-related decisions, fostering a sense of ownership and commitment. If each stakeholder moves in different directions, chaos will be the only outcome.
-
Data Sharing and Analysis
Effective framework relies on the transparent sharing and collaborative analysis of data. It is not enough for administrators to collect data in isolation; instead, they must actively engage teachers, support staff, and parents in the process of interpreting the data and identifying areas for improvement. In one middle school, the PBIS team created a user-friendly dashboard that displayed real-time data on office referrals, attendance rates, and academic performance. This dashboard was accessible to all teachers, who were encouraged to use the data to inform their classroom management strategies and to identify students who might need additional support. The collaborative analysis of the data led to the identification of several previously overlooked patterns, allowing the team to develop more targeted and effective interventions. This shared analysis allowed the team to make efficient data driven decisions.
-
Consistent Communication and Feedback
Ongoing and consistent communication is essential for sustaining the framework. This includes regular meetings, newsletters, and other channels for sharing information about successes, challenges, and upcoming events. In one high school, the PBIS team established a bi-weekly newsletter that highlighted positive student behaviors, shared data on school-wide progress, and provided tips for implementing the framework in the classroom. The newsletter also included a feedback mechanism, allowing teachers, parents, and students to share their thoughts and suggestions. This continuous communication loop fostered a sense of transparency and accountability, ensuring that everyone was informed and engaged in the effort.
-
Shared Responsibility for Student Success
Ultimately, collaboration fosters a shared responsibility for student success. It reinforces the understanding that creating a positive and supportive learning environment is not the sole responsibility of teachers or administrators, but rather a collective endeavor involving the entire school community. In one school district, the superintendent implemented a policy requiring all schools to establish PBIS teams comprised of representatives from different stakeholder groups. These teams were tasked with developing and implementing school-specific action plans, fostering a sense of ownership and accountability at the local level. This shared responsibility ensured that the framework was not viewed as a top-down mandate, but rather as a collaborative effort to create a better future for all students. The framework is successful only when its successful for everyone.
These interconnected facets of collaboration form the bedrock of a thriving PBIS implementation. They demonstrate that the framework is not simply a set of techniques or strategies, but a way of working together to create a positive and supportive school environment for all students. Without this commitment to collaboration, the framework risks becoming a fragmented and ineffective set of practices, failing to achieve its full potential. In essence, collaboration is the engine that drives the framework forward, propelling it toward its ultimate goal of creating a more equitable and successful learning environment for all students.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Framework
The implementation of the framework in schools often sparks questions. Understanding these inquiries is essential for successful adoption and sustained implementation. The following provides answers to some frequently asked questions, presented through illustrative scenarios.
Question 1: Is the Framework simply a way to avoid disciplining students?
The notion that the framework seeks to eliminate discipline altogether is a misconception. Consider the story of Northwood Elementary. Before its implementation, Northwood relied heavily on punitive measures: detention, suspension, and expulsion. While these measures temporarily removed disruptive students, they did little to address the underlying causes of misbehavior. Students returned from suspension often repeating the same offenses. Implementation at Northwood focused on explicitly teaching expected behaviors, providing positive reinforcement, and addressing the root causes of misbehavior through tiered interventions. Discipline, while not eliminated, became a last resort, reserved for the most serious offenses. The framework seeks to create a culture of prevention and support, reducing the need for punitive measures, not eliminating them entirely.
Question 2: How much does it cost to implement?
Financial concerns understandably surface when considering new initiatives. A common misconception is that its implementation requires a massive influx of resources. Consider Elmwood High School, facing budget constraints. Instead of seeking additional funding, the PBIS team creatively reallocated existing resources. Professional development funds were used to train staff on positive behavior strategies, and existing staff members were assigned to support the framework’s implementation. While some schools may require additional resources, many can effectively implement the framework by strategically redeploying existing funds and leveraging community partnerships.
Question 3: Is it just another educational fad that will fade away?
Educational trends often come and go, leaving educators wary of investing in new approaches. The concern that the framework is simply another fad is understandable. Maplewood Middle School had a history of implementing various educational programs, many of which were abandoned after a few years. What distinguished PBIS was its data-driven approach and its focus on systemic change. Implementation at Maplewood began with a thorough assessment of the school’s behavioral needs, followed by the development of a comprehensive action plan. The team continuously monitored data to track progress and make adjustments. This commitment to data and systemic change ensured that the framework was not just another program, but a fundamental shift in the school’s culture.
Question 4: Does it work for all students, including those with severe behavioral challenges?
The ability of any intervention to address the needs of all students is a valid concern, particularly when dealing with severe behavioral challenges. Oakdale Academy, a school for students with emotional and behavioral disorders, faced this challenge directly. The PBIS team adapted the framework to meet the unique needs of their students, providing intensive individualized support, including functional behavior assessments and behavior intervention plans. While the framework may require adjustments to address the needs of students with severe behavioral challenges, its principles can be applied effectively in specialized settings. This may require collaboration with external specialists and a commitment to individualized support.
Question 5: How do we ensure that the framework is implemented consistently across the entire school?
Consistency is paramount for success, yet ensuring consistency across an entire school can be a daunting task. At Riverside Elementary, the principal recognized the importance of consistent implementation and took steps to ensure that all staff members were on board. She established a clear set of school-wide expectations, provided ongoing professional development, and created opportunities for teachers to collaborate and share best practices. She also implemented a system of regular classroom observations to monitor implementation fidelity. The framework’s team is a resource. By communicating, and offering support. A strong leadership, and open communication are critical for promoting consistency across the school.
Question 6: How do we sustain the framework over time, especially when staff turnover occurs?
Sustaining any initiative over the long term requires careful planning, especially in the face of staff turnover. Sunrise High School addressed this challenge by embedding the framework into the school’s culture. They created a comprehensive training program for new staff members, established a PBIS leadership team comprised of veteran teachers, and developed a system for documenting and sharing best practices. They also made the framework a priority in the school’s improvement plan, ensuring that it remained a focus for years to come. Embedding it into the school’s culture, documenting successes, and prioritizing it in the school’s improvement plan.
These narratives reveal that the framework is not a quick fix, but rather a long-term commitment that requires careful planning, ongoing support, and a willingness to adapt to the unique needs of each school community. By addressing these common questions and misconceptions, schools can pave the way for successful implementation and sustained impact.
The next section will explore real-world examples, showcasing successful implementations and highlighting the positive impact on student outcomes and school climate.
Successful Implementations of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
The journey toward creating a positive and supportive learning environment is rarely linear. It demands commitment, careful planning, and a willingness to adapt. The following tips, gleaned from successful implementations of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), offer practical guidance for educators embarking on this journey.
Tip 1: Secure Administrative Buy-In From the Outset
The story of Crestwood High exemplifies the power of strong administrative support. When Crestwood’s new principal, Mrs. Davies, arrived, the school was plagued by frequent disciplinary issues and low morale. Mrs. Davies, a proponent of the framework, immediately prioritized its implementation. She attended every training session, actively participated in team meetings, and consistently communicated the importance of the framework to the entire staff. Her visible commitment inspired teachers to embrace the framework and dedicate themselves to its success. Secure the unequivocal support of school leadership. Without it, the effort is akin to building a house on sand.
Tip 2: Form a Diverse and Representative PBIS Team
At Maplewood Elementary, the initial PBIS team consisted solely of administrators. Despite their best efforts, the framework failed to gain traction among teachers. Recognizing their mistake, the team expanded to include representatives from all grade levels, support staff, and even parents. This diverse team brought a wider range of perspectives and experiences to the table, resulting in a more comprehensive and effective plan. Construct a team that reflects the diversity of the school community. A team composed of varied voices ensures a more holistic and relevant approach.
Tip 3: Start Small and Build Momentum Gradually
The desire to implement the framework fully and immediately is understandable, but often leads to burnout and frustration. Riverside Middle School learned this lesson the hard way. They attempted to implement all aspects of the framework simultaneously, overwhelming teachers and leading to a lack of consistency. The following year, they adopted a more strategic approach, focusing on a few key areas, such as school-wide expectations and positive reinforcement. Once they achieved success in these areas, they gradually expanded the framework to include additional components. Begin with achievable goals and expand as confidence and competence grow. Rome wasn’t built in a day, and neither is a positive school culture.
Tip 4: Use Data to Drive Decision-Making and Track Progress
Oakwood High initially struggled to demonstrate the effectiveness of their PBIS implementation. They were collecting data, but not using it effectively to inform their decisions. The turning point came when they began analyzing their data more rigorously, identifying patterns and trends that informed their interventions. For instance, they discovered that a disproportionate number of disciplinary incidents occurred in the cafeteria during lunch. This led them to implement targeted interventions, such as increased supervision and organized activities, resulting in a significant reduction in cafeteria-related incidents. Let data be the compass, guiding decisions and demonstrating the impact of efforts. Without it, the journey lacks direction and proof of progress.
Tip 5: Celebrate Successes and Acknowledge Effort
The implementation of the framework can be challenging, and it is important to celebrate successes along the way. At Sunrise Elementary, the PBIS team made a point of regularly acknowledging teachers and staff members who were implementing the framework effectively. They created a “PBIS Spotlight” in the school newsletter, highlighting successful initiatives and recognizing individual contributions. These small acts of appreciation boosted morale and reinforced the importance of the framework. Acknowledge accomplishments, both big and small, to sustain momentum and foster a sense of shared accomplishment. Recognition fuels motivation and reinforces commitment.
Tip 6: Invest in Ongoing Professional Development
The framework is not a static program, but rather a dynamic process that requires ongoing learning and adaptation. Willow Creek Middle School recognized this and made a commitment to providing regular professional development opportunities for their staff. They brought in experts to provide training on specific topics, such as classroom management and de-escalation techniques. These ongoing training sessions ensured that teachers were equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to implement the framework effectively. Invest in continuous learning to equip staff with the tools needed for sustained success. Knowledge is the bedrock of effective implementation.
Tip 7: Foster Strong Family and Community Partnerships
The framework’s impact extends beyond the school walls. Engaging families and community members in the process is crucial for creating a supportive environment for students both inside and outside of school. At Valley View Elementary, the PBIS team actively sought input from parents and community organizations. They held regular meetings to share information about the framework and solicit feedback. They also partnered with local businesses to provide incentives for students who demonstrated positive behaviors. Forge alliances with families and the community to extend the framework’s reach and impact. A united front strengthens the message and reinforces positive behaviors across all environments.
By adhering to these guiding principles, educators can navigate the complexities of framework implementation and create a more positive, supportive, and equitable learning environment for all students.
The upcoming conclusion will reinforce the benefits and provide a final call to action for schools considering this crucial change.
What Does PBIS Stand for in Education
This exploration has unveiled Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) as more than just an acronym; it’s a commitment to fostering environments where positive conduct thrives. From proactive prevention to data-driven decisions, from a systemic approach to the power of reinforcement, tiered support, and relentless collaboration, each facet underscores the dedication to nurturing not only academic prowess but also the emotional well-being of every student.
The halls of McKinley High once echoed with discord, detention slips fluttering like fallen leaves. Now, laughter rings true, respect threads conversations, and students blossom with newfound confidence. This transformation wasn’t born of fleeting trends but from the sustained, intentional effort to create a culture of support. As McKinley’s story attests, schools stand at a crossroads. They can perpetuate reactive cycles or embark on a journey of proactive change. The choice lies in embracing the principles. Let us choose wisely, and choose PBIS. Schools must embrace Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports as a catalyst for building brighter futures, one positive interaction at a time.
